In some countries the elderly are highly valued and respected, while in others youth is more highly valued. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

-

 

A generation term coined to reflect the difference of opinions and attitudes between younger and older people. A handful masses contemplate that in few nations, senior citizens are given more priority; whereas, others advocate that in other nations adults are given more preference. This essay will examine both the given notions and my personal perspective in the subsequent paragraphs.

On the one hand, nothing can be best than the presence of elder people for the nourishment of children at home. Moreover, they encourage them and are good motivators which will help the upcoming generation to succeed in their life. They have more experiences and wise knowledge as they have come across many (hurdles) situations throughout their life. Consequently, they do not get high respect;  they earn it through their patience and hardships for their new coming generations.

On the other hand, there are others who opine that youngsters are back-bone of a nation. In this digital era, complex and smart working require energetic people with a wide range of knowledge. For instance, armed and labour jobs need more energy and toleration power which is hardly possible for senior citizens. However, at an early age, their active mind and courage help them to work harder even in difficult times. Their excellent adaptability with technology may benefit their nation in further researches.

To conclude that, both the generations are more beneficial than harming to their homeland. In my opinion, the respect of different age groups is different according to the mindset and expectations towards them by society, so they should be given equal priority.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The chart below shows the changes that took place in three areas of crime in New Port city center from 2001-2012. Write at least 150 words.

-
The given line chart depicts information regarding the swapped figures of offences  taken place in New Port city center in a decade. In 2003, burglary cases noticed as the top most offence at 3500 approximately which then rose to  3700 in 2004. An instant decline in burglar cases  folded  to one-third (1200) and stayed almost same in next four years which counted at 1400 in 2012. However, the offences of robbery were 600 in the beginning of decade and its figures fluctuated slightly with similar number of cases till 2012. Whereas, 2700 cases registered for stolen cars in 2003 and remained same till 2005. A swift decline to the number of auto theft offences were 2100 in 2005. An unorder pattern seen in next couple of years , which stood at 2400 in the end of that decade. In conclusion, burglar cases had  lessened; whereas, offences of stolen cars and robbery stabled will the similar figures in all ten years. 
Read more

The maps below show the town of Langley in 1910 and 1950. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

-
Image
The given maps depict the changes that occurred in the town of Langley and how it was in the past years.  In 1910, on both sides of Jordan Street, there were few small houses. The same street towards the south was facing the railway lines just beside the cottages for railway employees as well as wasteland. Sherman Street was surrounded by houses and ended at the cafe opposing store and laundry buildings. In the north side, there was a factory on the right of another wasteland. Forty years later, most of the Sherman street area was replaced by a new park having particular playing area for children. The  Factory was diminished and new buildings were constructed named as Sherman Mansions. Laundry and Cafe relocated to the wasteland area near mansions. A new lane was built with multiple stores where there were railway cottages years before. Jordan Street's houses were changed to three dedicated buildings for flats.  Overall, there were a number of notable changes to the build...
Read more

Some people think it is more important to plant more tree in open areas in towns and cities than provide more housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

-
Since the beginning, trees have furnished us with two of life’s essentials that are food and oxygen. I agree to point that plantation is necessary which enhances the quality of life, but, shelters must be given some priority as it is also our basic necessity.  Letting trees to own open areas for them is an intensive change today's environment needs. They are contributing our nature by improving air quality, preserving soil and supporting wildlife; moreover, human life directly depends on these things. Deforestation done from past years lead to bad weather conditions and its dramatic nature, due to which inhabitants again want a healthy life. A best peaceful life is only possible when we are surrounded by trees which also gives us positive vibes that can not be taken using artificial methods. Rather a shelter is also an indispensable requirement, but the land must be owned as per the size of the family not according to the wealth of a person. Increasing population is cutting trees t...
Read more