Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

-

Organizing international games is an ongoing trend among all nations. A handful of masses contemplate that nation is benefited by global games affairs; however, others advocate it false. I believe there is some truth to the notion and the former view hammer the latter one for valid reasons.


The popularity of different sports all over the world insist people to go to attend the organized events held either in their own country or any other nation. Who have benefited? both people as well as organizers, people explore their hidden talents, but, more than that nation get profited from many sides. Essentially, the benefit of economic growth is higher living standards which include higher real incomes and the ability to devote more resources to areas like health care and education.


As far as the negatives of global physical activities are concerned, it affects other nations when the economy of the nation raised, where events held. Inviting overseas as well as native people to experience competitions are as much bad as good these days. For instance, after the pandemic,  hazardous viruses are viral in the atmosphere, which can affect people gathered in a huge crowd. During those days or weeks of events, the travelling expenses get inflated due to which other people suffer.  


Precisely, games performances are indispensable for the representees and the welfare of the nation where they held. All strength-based activities must be organized globally for interested people as well as to appreciate one's efforts and hard work. A rule should be introduced to allow every nation equally. 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The chart below shows the changes that took place in three areas of crime in New Port city center from 2001-2012. Write at least 150 words.

-
The given line chart depicts information regarding the swapped figures of offences  taken place in New Port city center in a decade. In 2003, burglary cases noticed as the top most offence at 3500 approximately which then rose to  3700 in 2004. An instant decline in burglar cases  folded  to one-third (1200) and stayed almost same in next four years which counted at 1400 in 2012. However, the offences of robbery were 600 in the beginning of decade and its figures fluctuated slightly with similar number of cases till 2012. Whereas, 2700 cases registered for stolen cars in 2003 and remained same till 2005. A swift decline to the number of auto theft offences were 2100 in 2005. An unorder pattern seen in next couple of years , which stood at 2400 in the end of that decade. In conclusion, burglar cases had  lessened; whereas, offences of stolen cars and robbery stabled will the similar figures in all ten years. 
Read more

The maps below show the town of Langley in 1910 and 1950. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

-
Image
The given maps depict the changes that occurred in the town of Langley and how it was in the past years.  In 1910, on both sides of Jordan Street, there were few small houses. The same street towards the south was facing the railway lines just beside the cottages for railway employees as well as wasteland. Sherman Street was surrounded by houses and ended at the cafe opposing store and laundry buildings. In the north side, there was a factory on the right of another wasteland. Forty years later, most of the Sherman street area was replaced by a new park having particular playing area for children. The  Factory was diminished and new buildings were constructed named as Sherman Mansions. Laundry and Cafe relocated to the wasteland area near mansions. A new lane was built with multiple stores where there were railway cottages years before. Jordan Street's houses were changed to three dedicated buildings for flats.  Overall, there were a number of notable changes to the build...
Read more

Some people think it is more important to plant more tree in open areas in towns and cities than provide more housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

-
Since the beginning, trees have furnished us with two of life’s essentials that are food and oxygen. I agree to point that plantation is necessary which enhances the quality of life, but, shelters must be given some priority as it is also our basic necessity.  Letting trees to own open areas for them is an intensive change today's environment needs. They are contributing our nature by improving air quality, preserving soil and supporting wildlife; moreover, human life directly depends on these things. Deforestation done from past years lead to bad weather conditions and its dramatic nature, due to which inhabitants again want a healthy life. A best peaceful life is only possible when we are surrounded by trees which also gives us positive vibes that can not be taken using artificial methods. Rather a shelter is also an indispensable requirement, but the land must be owned as per the size of the family not according to the wealth of a person. Increasing population is cutting trees t...
Read more