Today people are living in a throwaway society where they use things for a short time only and then throw them away. What are the causes of this and what problems can it lead to?

-

Flipping onto new things is increasing unprecedentedly. Considering it as a common but serious problematic trend which is occurring due to myriad reasons. Its obvious effects are harming us adversely and will be discussed briefly.   


Why so materialistic? people busy in hectic schedules prefer to buy new things rather than repairing their old one for which they can not wait. It occurs due to superstitious people have a myth that keeping broken things will lead to a miserable life and affect their wealth. Advertising brands and the role models who promote those products insist people buy them even if they already have similar belongings such as clothes and cosmetics especially. 


Causes never over without harming nature, as the non-renewable products are effecting our environment adversely and their degradation boosts global warming. For instance, in a recent survey, the two-third proportion of garbage is plastic-based material which is non-biodegradable and sometimes eaten by animals result in death. Financing to buy expensive things just to maintain status may risk the buyer and his family's life while the shortage of instalments. Rather than saving, people are just wasting their money they earned by their hardships and may face problems while medical urgency.       


Precisely, things are made for our better lifestyle and we are supposed to use them for positive outcomes which are not at all. A proper line should be drawn to their uses to improve our shopping behaviour. Buying material for our own benefit is acceptable, but, saving nature must be our priority.    

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The chart below shows the changes that took place in three areas of crime in New Port city center from 2001-2012. Write at least 150 words.

-
The given line chart depicts information regarding the swapped figures of offences  taken place in New Port city center in a decade. In 2003, burglary cases noticed as the top most offence at 3500 approximately which then rose to  3700 in 2004. An instant decline in burglar cases  folded  to one-third (1200) and stayed almost same in next four years which counted at 1400 in 2012. However, the offences of robbery were 600 in the beginning of decade and its figures fluctuated slightly with similar number of cases till 2012. Whereas, 2700 cases registered for stolen cars in 2003 and remained same till 2005. A swift decline to the number of auto theft offences were 2100 in 2005. An unorder pattern seen in next couple of years , which stood at 2400 in the end of that decade. In conclusion, burglar cases had  lessened; whereas, offences of stolen cars and robbery stabled will the similar figures in all ten years. 
Read more

The maps below show the town of Langley in 1910 and 1950. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

-
Image
The given maps depict the changes that occurred in the town of Langley and how it was in the past years.  In 1910, on both sides of Jordan Street, there were few small houses. The same street towards the south was facing the railway lines just beside the cottages for railway employees as well as wasteland. Sherman Street was surrounded by houses and ended at the cafe opposing store and laundry buildings. In the north side, there was a factory on the right of another wasteland. Forty years later, most of the Sherman street area was replaced by a new park having particular playing area for children. The  Factory was diminished and new buildings were constructed named as Sherman Mansions. Laundry and Cafe relocated to the wasteland area near mansions. A new lane was built with multiple stores where there were railway cottages years before. Jordan Street's houses were changed to three dedicated buildings for flats.  Overall, there were a number of notable changes to the build...
Read more

Some people think it is more important to plant more tree in open areas in towns and cities than provide more housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

-
Since the beginning, trees have furnished us with two of life’s essentials that are food and oxygen. I agree to point that plantation is necessary which enhances the quality of life, but, shelters must be given some priority as it is also our basic necessity.  Letting trees to own open areas for them is an intensive change today's environment needs. They are contributing our nature by improving air quality, preserving soil and supporting wildlife; moreover, human life directly depends on these things. Deforestation done from past years lead to bad weather conditions and its dramatic nature, due to which inhabitants again want a healthy life. A best peaceful life is only possible when we are surrounded by trees which also gives us positive vibes that can not be taken using artificial methods. Rather a shelter is also an indispensable requirement, but the land must be owned as per the size of the family not according to the wealth of a person. Increasing population is cutting trees t...
Read more